I mentioned in my last post that I’ve found a happy home in two different critique communities. In both, I’ve found people with great advice, and those with different perspectives than my own — exactly what I went out searching for. But now that I’m subjecting my writing to the critical eyes of many other writers, I’ve been bombarded with the “rules” that I haven’t thought about in a long time.
Don’t get me wrong — I haven’t been writing in the wild west, flagrantly ignoring common rules of grammar and style. But I haven’t been self-editing too heavily while writing the first draft of any of my WIPs.
One of the rules that has been brought up more than once now, and which is a topic of great debate in the forums, is this: don’t use adverbs. This must be a good rule since everyone repeats it. After all, we all know that Stephen King dislikes adverbs above all other parts of speech, saying that the road to hell is paved with them. Or something like that.
And while I agree that using them continually, repeatedly and carelessly (see how I did that there?) can signal a writer unwilling to consider how to make their verbs strong enough to stand alone, I also feel that it’s unfair to cast aside one part of speech altogether. Adverbs, surely, serve a purpose.
Since being reminded of this “rule,” I’ve started reading with an eye toward evaluating how much use these pariahs get in the books that I enjoy. They’re not absent. In fact, they appear frequently in some of the books I like very much. Maybe my tastes are very un-literary. This has led me to believe that we, as writers, should be very careful with these types of “rules,” especially when critiquing the work of others. It is easy to stand with a crowd of self-professed literary types and spout dogma as if it was your own original thought. It is harder, perhaps, to step away from the crowd and see where a writer might be justified in breaking a rule to the benefit of their work.
Adverbs may not be the end all be all of the literary world, but I do believe they have a place there. If you are acting as a critic, be a thoughtful critic. Don’t page through someone’s work on the lookout for broken rules. Take a piece as a whole and try to see what the writer is doing. Give your fellow writers some credit for knowing the same rules you do, and see if they’re using their adverbs thoughtfully. (see how I did that again? I’m lazy. Willfully, stubbornly, admittedly lazy.)
Check out these other writers who defend the lowly adverb. (ha!)